Structural Failure Boundary Map

The falsifier before the agent.

A traceable system should fail where the closed-form inverse loses identifiability. Sundog froze this five-locus map before agent execution so the test cannot be rescued later by a convenient interpretation of success.

P0/P1 passed P2 first cut vacuous Cut 2 regime-separability Rendered Cut 3 held

Failure Boundary Intuition

The honest move is knowing when the trace stops locking on.

Think of the structure like a drifting floater in your eye: it can be real, but the moment you try to pin it down it slides out from under the reticle. A disciplined trace does not keep reporting a crisp position after that. It says eligible, abstain, or switch handles at the boundary.

Five-locus structural failure boundary map showing eligible windows, required breaks, and correlate tells.

How To Read It

What It Is

A pre-registered apparatus map: which indirect handles are eligible, where each handle must fail or switch, and what a shortcut correlate would keep doing past the boundary. It is one of three audit-chain artifacts in the public ledger; the siblings are the mesa-trap operating envelope and the K_facet v0.3h verdict.

What It Is Not

Not a universal proof, not a rendered-signal pass, and not evidence that a probe-readout proves route use. The current public claim is narrower than that on purpose.

Current Finding

The closed-form Cut 2 line produced regime-separability: the route dominates where eligible, while the correlate only substitutes where the route already abstains. The geometry workbench shelf tracks where each closed-form inverse is and is not promoted.

Next Gate

Rendered Cut 3 is open but held. It needs H0 angular calibration, corpus records, baselines, edit operators, and renewed admission before any execution claim.

Inspection Trail